There has been much discussion recently about potential changes to the Small Business Administration (SBA) loan program, and more specifically the impact it will have on self-storage. In my best Dr. Seuss, rumors and rumblings have been running rampant with reckless abandon in industry rags, on message boards and trade show floors. The rumors would suggest that these changes are going to be extremely meaningful, providing additional access to capital and helping to solve many of the financing problems that self-storage owners face today.
The truth is that there have indeed been substantial modifications to the SBA 504 lending program, and in fact self-storage, or "mini-warehousing" as the SBA refers to it, is no longer an excluded property type. In practicality, however, the jury is still very much out on how meaningful these changes will be, and what, if any, impact they will have on our industry.
For those who are not overly familiar with SBA lending, it is currently administered by a manual of guidelines referred to as the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). The SBA released its first version of this SOP manual, Version 50-10 5, in August 2008. The SOP has been updated several times since, and the SBA now plans to update the SOP annually.
In the most previous version of the SOP 50 10 5(b), page 106, Mini-Warehousing was a named exclusion under a section paragraph that reads:
"Mini-warehouses, office suites, shopping centers, flea markets, and mobile home parks, are not eligible unless they provide sufficient services. Sufficient services shall be deemed to exist when more than 50% of the business's revenue for the prior year is derived from the services provided rather than from rental income." (SOP 50 10 5(b): Subpart B, III, Section D (Ineligible Types of Business), 3,c,7))
So in addition to specifically naming "mini-warehouses", there is really no way that a self-storage property would ever meet this "sufficient services" test; clearly most self-storage operators would agree that deriving more than 50% of income from services other than rental income is not feasible and nearly impossible.
To solve this problem, this specific paragraph, which clearly excludes "mini-warehouses," and which formerly had appeared in all previous versions in some fashion, has been deleted from the newest Version SOP 50 10 5(c), effective October 1, 2010,. Indeed, neither the "sufficient services" test nor the named exclusion any longer exists; as a result, it would definitely appear that loans under the 504 program for this type of small business will now be permitted.
In the newest version SOP 50 10 5(C), it would appear that one major hurdle still clearly exists. In fact, although the part of paragraph 7 that specially named mini-warehousing was deleted, along with the "sufficient services" test, paragraph 3 of that same section on Ineligible Types of Business in the new version of the SOP very clearly reads:
"Businesses that are primarily engaged in owning or purchasing real estate and leasing it for any purpose are not eligible. For example, shopping centers are not eligible and businesses that lease land for the installation of a cell phone tower or wind turbine also are not eligible; however, the business operating the cell phone tower or wind turbine is eligible" (SOP 50 10 5(b): Subpart B, III, Section D (Ineligible Types of Business), 3,c,4))
OK, at this point I am confused, and you must be too. Anyone actively engaged in the self-storage business would clearly agree that we are very much in the business of "owning and purchasing real estate and leasing it". Furthermore, throughout the past the industry as a whole has been actively engaged in trying to educate lenders of the very opposite, incessantly beating the drum that self-storage is a sophisticated commercial real estate play, just like apartments and retail shopping centers....both of which are ineligible for SBA financing, by the way.
And if you think YOU are confused, imagine how your local lender must feel. I don't know about you, but I am sure that most local lenders have a very good handle on the nuances of the ever changing versions of the SBA SOP. Can you smell the sarcasm in the air? I sure hope so, because it's thick. The first mention of the particular changes I have been referring to occurs on roughly page 106 of the current version of the SOP, a document that can literally make your head spin following the twists and turns.
There is little argument that the intent of this new version of the SOP is to make SBA loans more available to certain types of business, including self-storage; the elimination of the named exclusion, along with the "sufficient services" test, make that abundantly clear. But the fact that businesses engaged in owing real estate for the purpose of leasing it to generate revenue are excluded certainly makes things less clear, and still in search of additional answers.
It turns out that upon further review, it all boils down to a "depends" question - it really depends on one's interpretation and definition of the term "primarily engaged". Sounds a little Bill Clinton, doesn't it? Apparently, the SBA's interpretation of the self-storage business is not the same as yours or mine might be. In fact, to the contrary, the SBA interprets that self-storage owners are "primarily engaged" in the provision of mini warehouse services, and NOT the leasing of real estate. Wow, who knew? Regardless, if that is the case, it is certainly good news, right?
In the past, even if there were a way to get around all of the hurdles related to self-storage, there was one other minor obstacle that may have largely eliminated SBA financing as a viable alternative for many self-storage transactions. Unfortunately, one of the eligibility requirements of the SBA 504 program is that program can NOT be used for "consolidating or repaying debt, or for refinancing". So essentially, only construction or acquisition loans are eligible, not refinance, which aside from being a major segment of the business, is the major obstacle facing owners today.
Except.....in another moving piece of bureaucracy, fortunately the Administration has recently passed legislation that waives this restriction, temporarily allowing refinance transactions for the next 24 months. This occurred under a new temporary commercial real estate program, which resides outside of the newest Version of the SOP, by the way. Whew, that was close.
Technically, and in theory, the door is now open to self-storage borrowers to access SBA loan proceeds. There are unfortunate realities, however, that have the potential to make the effectiveness more minimal than meaningful in practical application. At the end of the day it boils down to the fact that this is a government program with a lot of red tape and bureaucracy involved. The following are observations based on experience, which I believe are practical impediments that will stunt the effectiveness of SBA lending for our industry:
The bottom line is that it does in fact appear that self-storage, mini warehouses, or whatever you might call them, are now eligible for SBA financing. The intent of the federal government in making them eligible is clearly to help owners of these properties have more options with respect to financing. All kidding aside, the Federal Government is trying to do a good thing here to help the small business owner, and has obviously recognized that there are a lot of good, hardworking Americans that have a lot on the line in this high stakes game of recession jeopardy. It also shows that our beloved self-storage industry is on their radar. Both of these are very good things and nobody is joking about that.
This article has been reprinted with permission from Mini-Storage Messenger.
The BSC Group has been voted Best of Business - Finance for six years running by the readers of Inside Self-Storage.